Bogdan defines "freak" as a "frame of mind", a set of practices, a way of thinking about and presenting people. I think this subject differs from the normal vs. deviant topic because it looks more on to the scientific/biological abnormalities of the human race. That is also why I think it has continued on for so long; Only if there was a scientific purpose.
I was able to watch a show called BodyShock that introduced the life of disabled or deformed people. The episode I watched was on the worlds tallest man. It was very interesting to learn about the cultural and social adjustments that person had to make in order to live a normal life. The show portrayed the worlds tallest man almost as a hero, to show appreciation and attention he needs to overcome their disability.
Brian Gallagher
Brian,
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure if I fully follow your point about how Bogdan's definition of "freak" deviates from the topic of defining normalcy versus deviance. What Bogdan is saying is that what we assume to be a scientific/biological identity (the freak) is really an identity that is culturally constructed. Remember Garland-Thomson's point that what we assume to be a freak of nature is really a freak of culture.
Also, is it problematic that we regard disability as something that needs to be "overcome"? Instead, should we accept disability as a natural part of human life, not as a stigmatized identity that needs to be "cured" or "corrected"?