Besides Medical
Apartheid having a biased ring to it, I appreciate the information. But
when Washington equated Dr. Kevrorkian with Eugenics, I was shocked. Washington
states that along with Harry Haiselden, Dr Kevorkian, “Hastened the death of
those they perceived as ‘unfit for life,’ and both chose their victim from the
poles of life.” The only difference Washington suggests is that Kevorkian
preyed upon the, “old or ill” (192). So according to Washington, euthanasia or
assisted suicide is the same as or would fall under eugenics? Huh! First off,
Kevorkians' patients were all older, terminally ill and consented to
“treatment”. Those who succumbed to the evils of true eugenics through
sterilization were forced, tricked, or consented against their own volition.
Euthanasia is known as “mercy killing.” If everyone has the right to live, then
everyone should also have the right to die. I think Washington needs to
eliminate such biased opinions in her work, and especially understand that when discussing
eugenics there is no correlation with Dr. Kevorkian and euthanasia, for they are completely
different subjects.
Domalski
No comments:
Post a Comment