Visibility of Radical Forms of Body Modification

One thing which has been really swirling about in my brain since our discussion body modification is the invisibility of certain radical forms of body modification practices as compared to those which are considered to be cultural appropriate body modification practices such as cosmetic surgery. Is this essentially a way to a conceal the deviant and market the norm? When radical forms of body modification are often displayed within public view they are often highlighted as primitive, taboo, freakish, and even inhibitor to one’s well-being. Often harnessing historical and contemporary perceptions and attitudes of radical forms of body modification. Furthermore, the significance of radical forms of body modification is diluted. For the stories and relevance behind the procedures are often removed, or the certain form of body modification is portrayed as less of resistant movement and more of a subcultural practice.Whereas, cosmetic surgery is treated as a normal, medical procedure, which can ultimately improve one’s well-being. Does the invisibility of the radical forms of body modification aid in their resistant purpose? Or should more radical forms of body modification be made more visible?

Angela B.